Colombian Civil Procedure Code DAVILA Miller argues that this type of joint litigation, by a substantial connection fits all, the law merely authorizes, but requires their presence, so the claim can not be validly proposal, but several subjects or compared to many. The necessary co-parties should be called in the process, but the resolution to be issued will be totally ineffective. If the judge noted that a necessary co-parties has not been located, it can paralyze the process, in order to be notified, not only provides the added co-parties process information, but takes time to to come forward and even try additional hearing when the evidence already taken place. Eg: A spouse claim the invalidity of a contract of sale on a social good, as it has been sold by her husband without his intervention. The first claim against the buyer, but the demand does not reflect the substantive, in the case of the invalidity of the measure. They are part of the relationship who asked the nullity and those who participated in the act, and consequently, it is evident that failed to sue the spouse who first sold without intervention, is suing a co-parties lacked necessary. Art. 83 of the Colombian Civil Procedure Code states: "When the process be about relationships or legal acts for which by its nature or by law, can not be resolved without the appearance of merit of the persons who are subjects of such relationships or who participated in these acts, the application shall be made in all or go against all.
Sumar Soccer Edson Silva a scene seen in made a collective one me to think about writing this text. Seated side by side, two young, that if did not know, since one was seated and another one seated when part of the double bank became vacant, used each one its shirt of soccer, one of the Guarani de Campinas (my only teams of the heart) and another one of the So Paulo, coincidently both of goleiros. They had not changed word in the passage, but I found the fact symbolic convinced that me that it must have equality and not tolerance as many proclaim for there. I understand that to tolerate a thing it is half egoistic, as if to feel absolutely certain, to find that another person is missed, but of superior form then to support it. For the scene I used symbology of esportivos adversaries, in the case soccer, but it can be used in all directions of the life, as religious divergences, politics and any other more than will have. When we respect equal rights for all we do not need taxing in them of tolerant, after all to be right or wrong it is point of view, it is choice question. Logical that each individual has preference in more diverse fields of activities and right to reveal it is by means of its shirt or flag of soccer (or another sport), of saying of its preferences politics, professionals, in its way of life, right who are its and at last inalienable since that they do not wound rights of other individuals or other beings livings creature. Who knows practising this, the humanity does not learn to live in peace? In the heat of an event each person defends with the heart its preference, sings, supports its teams, inside...